Flagship course
Materiality for Digital Service Firms
An eleven-week path from benchmark selection to a reviewer-ready memo—built for auditors serving subscription, marketplace, and agency clients in Korea.
Learning outcomes
What you will be able to defend
- Select and justify benchmarks when profit is volatile or near break-even.
- Set performance materiality that cascades into substantive sampling.
- Document qualitative factors that lower thresholds for KPI-sensitive items.
- Assess aggregation risk across deferred revenue, contract assets, and credits.
- Write a materiality memo that survives cold EQCR review without template fluff.
Informational pricing
Field Guide access from ₩420,000. Facilitated Working Papers path ₩890,000. Team Engagement Desk from ₩3.6M.
No checkout on this site. See Pricing and Contact to enroll.
Inquire about the next cohortModules
Eleven weeks, six critiqueable artifacts
-
Digital firm economics for auditors
Recurring revenue, capitalization policies, and why textbook profit benchmarks mislead.
-
Benchmark selection workshops
Revenue, gross margin, total assets, and hybrid anchors with Korean case packets.
-
Overall vs performance materiality
Cascades into accounts, and how to avoid silent double-cutting.
-
Qualitative overlays
Related parties, covenants, regulatory attention, and management bonuses tied to metrics.
-
Clearly trivial thresholds
When small credits still warrant communication—and when they do not.
-
Aggregation and offsetting
Contract assets, refund liabilities, and platform rebates that travel in packs.
-
Memo studio
Draft, peer redline, facilitator critique, final version for your methodology partner.
Instructor
Hana Seo
Former senior manager on technology audits across Korea and a methodology contributor on ISA 320 application notes for digital revenue. Hana facilitates critique labs and marks memo submissions personally in Working Papers cohorts.
FAQ
Practical limits before you enroll
Do I need ISA 320 familiarity already?
Yes. This is not an introduction to auditing standards. If you are new to materiality concepts, read your firm’s methodology chapter first; otherwise week two will feel compressed.
Can I use live client data?
Only sanitized extracts. We reject submissions with identifiable customer names, unredacted contract IDs, or personal data.
What is a real limitation of this course?
We do not certify that your firm’s methodology is ISA-compliant, and we cannot attend your EQCR meetings. Graduates still need internal approval before changing firm-wide thresholds.
Is the Cloud Billing Sampling Lab separate?
It is bundled in Working Papers and Engagement Desk. Field Guide learners can add it later by contacting us.
Course reviews
Varied notes from recent cohorts
Memo studio feedback on my qualitative overlays section was sharper than our internal training. I still skimmed the economics primer—too basic if you already live in SaaS audits.
Eunji Choi · Manager
★★★★☆Aggregation module paid for itself during a marketplace rebate review. Rating not perfect because evening labs collided with inventory count season.
Client in logistics software · after cohort 12
Busan-based senior. Benchmark workshop examples matched the agency groups I serve more than the Seoul unicorn cases.
Rina · Busan